This is an insurance policy which lasts, as the name says, for the policyholder's whole life.
It also has an investment component that allows its value to grow  tax-deferred, and you can withdraw that cash value before death, if  needed.
Steven M. Piascik, CPA, MT, and founder and president of boutique CPA firm FASCIA, likes the product for high-net-worth individuals because it provides tax-free income.
"Whole-life insurance is at the forefront very expensive, but after  10 years, if you set it up right, the cash value it builds is more than  you've paid for it," he says. "If you're paying a premium of $100,000  over 10 years, after 10 years you have value of $110,000. You're going  to use this money in retirement — but if you die before then, it's a  great hedge."
It sounds like a no-brainer, but in fact, most financial planners and  experts don't recommend whole-life insurance for clients of typical  income. Part of the reason why comes down to what Piascik told Business  Insider: It's expensive.
"If you're of average income, you're not going to want to pay upfront," Piascik says, "and I don't blame you at all."
Instead, many experts prefer term-life insurance, which does not have  an investment component and covers a policyholder for a set amount of  time — for instance, 30 years until their dependent children are grown  and self-supporting.
Term-life insurance is usually also more affordable. Automated investing platform Wealth front  used numbers from insurance provider MetLife to determine that a  30-year-old male could pay $672 a year for 20 years of term life  insurance ... and $8,320 a year for whole life insurance. (Bear in mind  that while the price difference here is staggering, insurance quotes  vary by policyholder and it's unlikely that these specific numbers would  apply to everyone.)
You could argue that the latter is projected to accumulate  significant cash value, while the former only covers a person at their  death. However, you can't see an impressive return on whole-life  insurance 30 years from now if you don't have the cash to fund it today.
Everyone's situation and insurance needs — not to mention their price  quotes— are different, but for all the times whole-life insurance is  touted as an investment, it's missing an important caveat: It's usually a  better investment for the rich.

No comments:
Post a Comment